[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
We have to avoid the use of the 'is' identity operator with basic,
immutable values such as numbers and strings. The result is
unpredictable because of the way Python handles these objects
internally.
How is with this issue in Python 3.0? Is it fixed? Does Python hand
On May 13, 5:37 am, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> > We have to avoid the use of the 'is' identity operator with basic,
> > immutable values such as numbers and strings. The result is
> > unpredictable because of the way Python handles these objects
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> We have to avoid the use of the 'is' identity operator with basic,
> immutable values such as numbers and strings. The result is
> unpredictable because of the way Python handles these objects
> internally.
You are confusing immutable objects with singletons. Never use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have to avoid the use of the 'is' identity operator with basic,
immutable values such as numbers and strings.
I'm glad for you. Did you really write checks like "if foo is 27" ?
The point is, you have to learn technologies to use them. It's not like
technologies l
On May 13, 5:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We have to avoid the use of the 'is' identity operator with basic,
> immutable values such as numbers and strings. The result is
> unpredictable because of the way Python handles these objects
> internally.
>
> How is with this issue in Python 3.0? Is
