Re: Testing conditions.

2005-02-12 Thread Ray Gibbon
> Testing conditions. > All replies - Spot on! Much appreciated, apology for delay. Ray. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Testing conditions.

2005-02-10 Thread Nick Coghlan
Ray Gibbon wrote: Before I resign myself to the inevitable, 'that's the way it is - get used to it', I'd just like to scratch it once. But, before I try walking on very thin ice, I want to ask whether there are expectations of some future changes which address these issues? I note PEP 3000 is sile

Re: Testing conditions.

2005-02-09 Thread Fredrik Lundh
Ray Gibbon wrote: > This is NOT another request for statements to be accepted as expressions for > two reasons:- > 1. I've seen enough arguments on the subject where I've found myself firmly > on the anti change side. > 2. I now realise that it might scratch the itch, but it would not cure it. > >

Re: Testing conditions.

2005-02-09 Thread Terry Reedy
"Ray Gibbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > e.g. 1 > |while new_data = get_more_data(source): > |process_data(new_data) > > is obviously the sort of thing I'm missing, but it is not a general > solution > because :- > > e.g. 2 > |while new_data, env

Re: Testing conditions.

2005-02-09 Thread Jeremy Bowers
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:38:54 +, Ray Gibbon wrote: > e.g. 2 > |while new_data, environment = get_more_data(source): > |process_data(new_data, environment) > > is something I'm equally likely to want to do, but I can't express it's > meaning. I think we'd usually phrase that as fo