Dennis Lee Bieber writes:
>> Python's version would be like "scanl" with an optional arg to make it
>> like "scanl1".
> Vs APL's "expand" operator?
I'm not familiar with that but maybe it's similar.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> As for the stdlib, the natural places for such a function would be
> either itertools or functools, and the function should probably be called
> "scan", inspired by this:
>
> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/List_processing#Scans
>
> Pytho
kj writes:
> But in the immediate term, cusum is not part of the standard library.
>
> Where would you put it if you wanted to reuse it? Do you create
> a module just for it? Or do you create a general stdlib2 module
> with all those workhorse functions that have not made it to the
> standard li
kj wrote:
I'm interested in reading people's take on the question and their
way of dealing with those functions they consider worthy of the
standard library.)
Well, I have no functions than I'm lobbying to get into the stdlib, but
for all those handy-dandy utility functions, decorators, and cl
