On 30 June 2013 07:06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and
> write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve
> the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing Python's clean
> syntax in the process.
This occurred to me o
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 8:06:35 AM UTC+2, Chris Angelico wrote:
> There's a bit of a discussion on python-ideas that includes a function
>
> that raises StopIteration. It inspired me to do something stupid, just
>
> to see how easily I could do it...
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:45 PM, N
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Joshua Landau
wrote:
> Beautiful, see?
Truly a work of art! I am awed.
ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 22:09 Mon 01 Jul , Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:36:29 +0100, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
>
> > Here is another example which I came across when playing with
> > generators, the first function is actually quite useful, the second
> > generator is the whole fun:
> >
> > from
Steven D'Aprano於 2013年7月2日星期二UTC+8上午6時09分18秒寫道：
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:36:29 +0100, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
>
>
>
> > Here is another example which I came across when playing with
>
> > generators, the first function is actually quite useful, the second
>
> > generator is the whole fun:
>
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:36:29 +0100, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
> Here is another example which I came across when playing with
> generators, the first function is actually quite useful, the second
> generator is the whole fun:
>
> from functools import wraps
> def init(func):
> """decorator wh
On 17:30 Mon 01 Jul , Joshua Landau wrote:
> On 1 July 2013 14:14, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> >> On 2013-06-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple,
> >>> and write an insanely complica
On 1 July 2013 14:14, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
>> On 2013-06-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple,
>>> and write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way
>>> to achieve the same t
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-06-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple,
>> and write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way
>> to achieve the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing
>> Python's
On 2013-06-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple,
> and write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way
> to achieve the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing
> Python's clean syntax in the process.
>
> Go on, do your worst!
I'v
On 30 June 2013 18:36, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> Pfft! Where's the challenge in that? Let's use an O(n!) algorithm for
> sorting -- yes, n factorial -- AND abuse a generator expression for its
> side effect. As a bonus, we use itertools, and just for the lulz, I
> obfuscate as many of the names as
In article <51d06cb6$0$2$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:06:35 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and write
> > an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve t
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:06:35 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and write
> an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve the same
> thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing Python's clean syntax in the
> process.
Here's a
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Yeah, I cannot seriously imagine that the stdlib does anything like
> the example I gave :) Pity nobody else is offering further examples, I
> thought this might be a fun thread.
Well, there is the "this" module. But its code is not *that*
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Joshua Landau
wrote:
> On 30 June 2013 15:58, Rick Johnson wrote:
>> Chris, i'm sorry, but your challenge is decades too late. If you seek
>> amusement you need look no further than the Python stdlib. If you REALLY
>> want to be amused, peruse the "idlelib" -- no
On 30 June 2013 15:58, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Chris, i'm sorry, but your challenge is decades too late. If you seek
> amusement you need look no further than the Python stdlib. If you REALLY want
> to be amused, peruse the "idlelib" -- not only is the code obfuscated, it
> also breaks PEP8 and t
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 1:06:35 AM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and
> write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve
> the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing Python's clean
> syntax in the process.
Ch
On 30Jun2013 16:06, Chris Angelico wrote:
| So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and
| write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve
| the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing Python's clean
| syntax in the process.
_Must_ you turn this int
On 30 June 2013 07:06, Chris Angelico wrote:
> There's a bit of a discussion on python-ideas that includes a function
> that raises StopIteration. It inspired me to do something stupid, just
> to see how easily I could do it...
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Re: [Pytho
19 matches
Mail list logo
