Re: Spambayes modifications with web services

2005-11-02 Thread Tim Williams (gmail)
On 02/11/05, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally I didn't regard the reply as unhelpful, and I believe the > replier was honestly trying to get you to see that your rather naive > suggestion was most unlikely to make things better. > To the OP A tip for curing your own problem -

Re: Spambayes modifications with web services

2005-11-02 Thread Steve Holden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thank you for the flippant remarks. Let's just say that I found them to > be unproductive. > > I would like to point out the process was not designed to be automatic > and I don't believe made such a statement. I should clarify that my > desire was to list each domain th

Re: Spambayes modifications with web services

2005-11-02 Thread benmorganpowell
Thank you for the flippant remarks. Let's just say that I found them to be unproductive. I would like to point out the process was not designed to be automatic and I don't believe made such a statement. I should clarify that my desire was to list each domain that was contained in a spam email, so

Re: Spambayes modifications with web services

2005-10-28 Thread Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In the last few months many personal website owners (such as myself) > have found that spammers have been using their domain names to > masquerade as valid users to send spam, normally in the form of: > So, as a web programmer and someone who specialises in getting good

Re: Spambayes modifications with web services

2005-10-28 Thread Neil Hodgson
benmorganpowell: > So, as a web programmer and someone who specialises in getting good > results on Google, I realised that I could simply post every spammer > website on a Google optimized page, which if searched for on Google > would return something like: > > "WARNING: DO NOT BUY FROM THIS WEB