Re: Spam levels.

2018-05-22 Thread dieter
"Peter J. Holzer" writes: > ... > I didn't read on Gmane. I read on my usenet server. But the broken > messages were all coming from Gmane. I am reading with an NNTP client connected to the Gmane NNTP server and and threading works - with very rare exceptions. The exeptions are so rare, that they

Re: Spam levels.

2018-05-22 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-05-22, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > I didn't read on Gmane. I read on my usenet server. But the broken > messages were all coming from Gmane. It is possible that the breakage > only occurs when Gmane passes the message to other Usenet servers, > although I have no idea how that could happen (

Re: Spam levels.

2018-05-22 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2018-05-22 20:42:43 +, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2018-05-22, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > On 2018-05-21 15:42:28 +, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> I switched from Usenet to Gmane mainly because references headers are > >> bit more consistent on Gmane, so threading works somewhat better. > > >

Re: Spam levels.

2018-05-22 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-05-22, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > On 2018-05-21 15:42:28 +, Grant Edwards wrote: >> I switched from Usenet to Gmane mainly because references headers are >> bit more consistent on Gmane, so threading works somewhat better. > > This is interesting, because Gmane was the reason I switched

Re: Spam levels.

2018-05-22 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2018-05-21 15:42:28 +, Grant Edwards wrote: > I switched from Usenet to Gmane mainly because references headers are > bit more consistent on Gmane, so threading works somewhat better. This is interesting, because Gmane was the reason I switched from reading on usenet to reading the mailingl

Re: Spam levels.

2018-05-22 Thread C W Rose via Python-list
m wrote: > W dniu 10.02.2018 o 15:57, C W Rose pisze: >> No other groups (in the limited set which I read) have the problem, >> and I don't understand why the spammers neither spam a range of >> groups, nor change their adddresses more frequently. It may be >> that destroying comp.lang.python is

Re: Spam levels.

2018-05-21 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-05-21, José María Mateos wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:00:41AM +0200, m wrote: >> I also almost stopped reading c.l.python, because of enormous spam >> levels. Do I have any option to read it without spam, other than launch >> my own filtering NNTP server and do whack the mole game f

Re: Spam levels.

2018-05-21 Thread José María Mateos
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:00:41AM +0200, m wrote: > I also almost stopped reading c.l.python, because of enormous spam > levels. Do I have any option to read it without spam, other than launch > my own filtering NNTP server and do whack the mole game for myself? > > Maybe join forces and establis

Re: Spam levels.

2018-05-21 Thread m
W dniu 10.02.2018 o 15:57, C W Rose pisze: > No other groups (in the limited set which I read) have the problem, > and I don't understand why the spammers neither spam a range of > groups, nor change their adddresses more frequently. It may be > that destroying comp.lang.python is their actual obj