Re: Some test fail on my new Python 2.6

Sorin Schwimmer wrote: > /usr/local/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf. The files are real. However, > creating symlinks in /usr/lib targeting the libraries in /usr/local/lib, > then recompiling, solved the tkinter problem. So, the conclusion is that > only /usr/lib is consulted for the tcl/tk libraries.

Re: Some test fail on my new Python 2.6

Hello again, /usr/local/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf. The files are real. However, creating symlinks in /usr/lib targeting the libraries in /usr/local/lib, then recompiling, solved the tkinter problem. So, the conclusion is that only /usr/lib is consulted for the tcl/tk libraries. multiprocessing -

Re: Some test fail on my new Python 2.6

Sorin Schwimmer wrote: > > Thanks for the pointers. > > Here are some answers: > > > Ok, so DBM wasn't built because it couldn't find the external symbol > > 'dbm_firstkey'. I have no idea off the top of my head why that would > > happen, but I don't think you really care at the moment since y

Re: Some test fail on my new Python 2.6

Thanks for the pointers. Here are some answers: > Ok, so DBM wasn't built because it couldn't find the external symbol > 'dbm_firstkey'. I have no idea off the top of my head why that would > happen, but I don't think you really care at the moment since you are > trying to get tkinter working.

Re: Some test fail on my new Python 2.6

Sorin Schwimmer wrote: > > I wanted to replace my old Python 2.4 and tcl/tk 8.4 with tcl/tk 8.5.6 and > Python 2.6, mainly so that I can enjoy ttk. tcl/tk was installed from sources > without any problem, I started a wish and worked. > > Now, for the Python, here are all the issues signaled by

Re: Some test fail on my new Python 2.6

I wanted to replace my old Python 2.4 and tcl/tk 8.4 with tcl/tk 8.5.6 and Python 2.6, mainly so that I can enjoy ttk. tcl/tk was installed from sources without any problem, I started a wish and worked. Now, for the Python, here are all the issues signaled by make test: running build running b

Re: Some test fail on my new Python 2.6

Sorin Schwimmer wrote: > > > Run 'make test' instead of running them one by one. > > I did it *before* going one by one. I then tried individual tests in hope of > getting hints of what to look for. Actualy, for the first three tests, the > "make test" script commented that it is unusual for t

Re: Some test fail on my new Python 2.6

> Run 'make test' instead of running them one by one. I did it *before* going one by one. I then tried individual tests in hope of getting hints of what to look for. Actualy, for the first three tests, the "make test" script commented that it is unusual for them to fail on my platform (linux2)