Stefan Ram wrote:
> Chris Green writes:
> >I have to say this seems very non-pythonesque to me, the 'obvious'
> >default simply doesn't work right, and I really can't think of a case
> >where the missing comma would make any sense at all.
>
> |6.15 Expression lists
> ...
> |an expression list co
On 11/24/2023 4:49 PM, Rimu Atkinson via Python-list wrote:
I really can't think of a case
where the missing comma would make any sense at all.
That is pretty tricky, yes.
The comma means it's a tuple. Without the comma, it's just a string with
parenthesis around it, which is a string.
On 11/24/23 14:10, Chris Green via Python-list wrote:
Chris Green wrote:
This is driving me crazy, I'm running this code:-
OK, I've found what's wrong:-
cr.execute(sql, ('%' + "2023-11" + '%'))
should be:-
cr.execute(sql, ('%' + x + '%',) )
I have to say this seems very
Am 24.11.2023 um 22:49 schrieb Rimu Atkinson via Python-list:
I really can't think of a case
where the missing comma would make any sense at all.
That is pretty tricky, yes.
The comma means it's a tuple. Without the comma, it's just a string with
parenthesis around it, which is a strin
Chris Green wrote:
> This is driving me crazy, I'm running this code:-
OK, I've found what's wrong:-
> cr.execute(sql, ('%' + "2023-11" + '%'))
should be:-
cr.execute(sql, ('%' + x + '%',) )
I have to say this seems very non-pythonesque to me, the 'obvious'
default simply doesn'
I really can't think of a case
where the missing comma would make any sense at all.
That is pretty tricky, yes.
The comma means it's a tuple. Without the comma, it's just a string with
parenthesis around it, which is a string.
PyDev console: starting.
Python 3.9.15 (main, Oct 28 2022
