Re: Setuptools, build and install dependencies

2007-06-25 Thread John J. Lee
Harry George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Harry George wrote: >> >>> We need to know the dependencies, install them in dependency order, >>> and expect the next package to find them. "configure" does this for >>> hundreds of packages. cmake, scons, a

Re: Setuptools, build and install dependencies

2007-06-25 Thread Harry George
Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Harry George wrote: > >> We need to know the dependencies, install them in dependency order, >> and expect the next package to find them. "configure" does this for >> hundreds of packages. cmake, scons, and others also tackle this >> problem. Python's o

Re: Setuptools, build and install dependencies

2007-06-22 Thread Robert Kern
Harry George wrote: > We need to know the dependencies, install them in dependency order, > and expect the next package to find them. "configure" does this for > hundreds of packages. cmake, scons, and others also tackle this > problem. Python's old setup.py seems to be able to do it. No, ge

Re: Setuptools, build and install dependencies (was: eggs considered harmful)

2007-06-22 Thread Harry George
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Harry George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Historically, python packages played well in this context. Install > > was a simple download, untar, setup.py build/install. > > > > Eggs and with other setuptools-inspired install processes break this > > pa