Re: Set literal confusion

2009-09-22 Thread Peter Otten
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > range() is what used to be xrange() -- an on-demand generator of > values. You created a set containing a single generator. Try something > like: > > 5 in {list(range(10))} No. {expr} is always a set with a single element. >>> {range(10)} {range(0, 10)} That element

Re: Set literal confusion

2009-09-22 Thread Vlastimil Brom
2009/9/22 kaoruAngel : > I recently decided to implement a small project in python after being > away from the language for a while, so, in learning the language over > again, I experimented. > > --- > Python 3.1.1 (r311:74483, Aug 17 2009, 16:45:59) [MSC v.1500

Re: Set literal confusion

2009-09-22 Thread Peter Otten
kaoruAngel wrote: > I recently decided to implement a small project in python after being > away from the language for a while, so, in learning the language over > again, I experimented. > > --- > Python 3.1.1 (r311:74483, Aug 17 2009, 16:45:59) [MSC v.1500 64