> e = 'i_am_an_attribute'
> o.(e) = 10
> o.i_am_an_attribute == 10
Yes I mean this thing: to write
o.(e) = 10
or
o.[e] = 10
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Yes, I mean this thing.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Peter Hansen wrote:
> Elmo Mäntynen wrote:
>
>> Maybe funny, but a bit too cocky for my taste. Robert kern is propably
>> right about what he really meant so don't be too hasty in the future,
>> right?).
>
> Elmo, it's probably neither cocky nor funny, but before you pass
> judgment you should
Elmo Mäntynen wrote:
>
> Peter Hansen wrote:
>>Заур Шибзухов wrote:
>>>Anybody thought about this issue?
>>
>>Perhaps not, but now that you've pointed it out they've taken the time
>>machine back and fixed the problem before it arose:
>
> Maybe funny, but a bit too cocky for my taste. Robert kern
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 07:07 pm, Elmo Mäntynen wrote:
> Peter Hansen wrote:
> > Заур Шибзухов wrote:
> >> There is a syntactic sugar for item access in
> >> dictionaries and sequences:
> >> o[e] = v <-> o.__setitem__(e, v)
> >> o[e] <-> o.__getitem__(e)
> >>
> >> where e is an expression.
> >>
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Hansen wrote:
> Заур Шибзухов wrote:
>
>> There is a syntactic sugar for item access in
>> dictionaries and sequences:
>>
>> o[e] = v <-> o.__setitem__(e, v)
>> o[e] <-> o.__getitem__(e)
>>
>> where e is an expression.
>>
>> There is no similar
Заур Шибзухов wrote:
> There is a syntactic sugar for item access in
> dictionaries and sequences:
>
> o[e] = v <-> o.__setitem__(e, v)
> o[e] <-> o.__getitem__(e)
>
> where e is an expression.
>
> There is no similar way for set/get attribute for objects.
> If e is a given name, then
>
>
Robert Kern wrote:
>> Заур Шибзухов wrote:
>>
>>> There is a syntactic sugar for item access in
>>> dictionaries and sequences:
>>>
>>> o[e] = v <-> o.__setitem__(e, v)
>>> o[e] <-> o.__getitem__(e)
>>>
>>> where e is an expression.
>>>
>>> There is no similar way for set/get attribute for objects.
Peter Hansen wrote:
> Заур Шибзухов wrote:
>
>>There is a syntactic sugar for item access in
>>dictionaries and sequences:
>>
>>o[e] = v <-> o.__setitem__(e, v)
>>o[e] <-> o.__getitem__(e)
>>
>>where e is an expression.
>>
>>There is no similar way for set/get attribute for objects.
>>If e is a gi
Заур Шибзухов wrote:
> There is a syntactic sugar for item access in
> dictionaries and sequences:
>
> o[e] = v <-> o.__setitem__(e, v)
> o[e] <-> o.__getitem__(e)
>
> where e is an expression.
>
> There is no similar way for set/get attribute for objects.
> If e is a given name, then
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
