[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>>"kpp9c" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>Numeric, Numarray, & Numpy... some one stick a screwdriver in my
>>>forehead and end the madness that Numeric has become.
>>
>>>For crying all night! Numpy was Numeric's ni
Terry Reedy wrote:
> "kpp9c" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Numeric, Numarray, & Numpy... some one stick a screwdriver in my
> > forehead and end the madness that Numeric has become.
>
> > For crying all night! Numpy was Numeric's nickname
>
> Given that NumPy *i
"kpp9c" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Numeric, Numarray, & Numpy... some one stick a screwdriver in my
> forehead and end the madness that Numeric has become.
> For crying all night! Numpy was Numeric's nickname
Given that NumPy *is* an updated version of Numeric
Numeric, Numarray, & Numpy... some one stick a screwdriver in my
forehead and end the madness that Numeric has become.
Brilliant programming & an almost essential part of scientific & math
hacking in python made maddeningly confusing by truly dumb naming
scheme.
For crying all night! Numpy was Nu
Tariq wrote:
> Has anyone been able to successfully install numpy 0.9.4 on python 2.4
> under cygwin?
>
> I'm getting a few errors, especially while it installs the C source.
I don't know of anyone compiling numpy under cygwin, but we will be happy to
help you on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you will giv
Has anyone been able to successfully install numpy 0.9.4 on python 2.4
under cygwin?
I'm getting a few errors, especially while it installs the C source.
--
Tariq
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
linda.s wrote:
> where to download numpy for Python 2.3 in Mac?
I don't think anybody has a binary package compiled for you. However, if you
have gcc installed, numpy should build out-of-box.
$ tar zcf ~/downloads/numpy-0.9.4.tar.gz
$ cd numpy-0.9.4
$ python setup.py build
$ sudo python setup.py
On 2/10/06, David M. Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "linda.s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > where to download numpy for Python 2.3 in Mac?
> > Thanks!
> > Linda
>
> I don't know if anybody's specifically compiled for 2.3; I think most
> of the developers on mac are using 2.4 :-)
>
> But (as
David M. Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "linda.s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > where to download numpy for Python 2.3 in Mac?
> > Thanks!
> > Linda
>
> I don't know if anybody's specifically compiled for 2.3; I think most
> of the developers on mac are using 2.4 :-)
However, what comes
"linda.s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> where to download numpy for Python 2.3 in Mac?
> Thanks!
> Linda
I don't know if anybody's specifically compiled for 2.3; I think most
of the developers on mac are using 2.4 :-)
But (assuming you have the developer tools installed) it's really to
compile:
where to download numpy for Python 2.3 in Mac?
Thanks!
Linda
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Tim Hochberg wrote:
> mclaugb wrote:
>
>
> No, Scientific Python is "a collection of Python modules that are useful
> for scientific computing" written by Konrad Hinsen. I'm not a user, but
> you can find information here:
>
> http://starship.python.net/~hinsen/ScientificPython/
>
> Sci
mclaugb wrote:
> Has anyone recompiled the Scientific Computing package using NumPy instead
> of Numeric?
What "Scientific Computing" package? I don't know of any package under that
name. AFAIK, Konrad Hinsen has not yet ported his ScientificPython package to
numpy, yet.
scipy 0.4+ is ported to
mclaugb wrote:
> Is Scipy the same thing as ScientificPython?
> I am confused if SciPy is just the new version. they appear to be separate
> things.
> Bryan
No, Scientific Python is "a collection of Python modules that are useful
for scientific computing" written by Konrad Hinsen. I'm not a use
mclaugb wrote:
> Is Scipy the same thing as ScientificPython?
> I am confused if SciPy is just the new version. they appear to be separate
> things.
They are separate projects.
--
Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
Are the graves of dreams allowed
mclaugb wrote:
> Is Scipy the same thing as ScientificPython?
No. They are two separate projects. Scientific Python is still
Numeric-only. SciPy 0.3.x is Numeric-based and SciPy 0.4.x is NumPy-based.
The developers for NumPy are also the developers for SciPy (for the most
part).
There is a
Is Scipy the same thing as ScientificPython?
I am confused if SciPy is just the new version. they appear to be separate
things.
Bryan
"Brendan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As of version 0.4.x, Scipy exclusively uses the newer NumPy module
> instead of the older
As of version 0.4.x, Scipy exclusively uses the newer NumPy module
instead of the older Numeric module. The confusion is inevitable in
this time of transition, but their intent is to standardize on one
array package.
Brendan
--
Brendan Simons
mclaugb wrote:
> This page documents the difference
This page documents the differences. It seems that NumPy is supported and
more recent.
http://numeric.scipy.org/
"linda.s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/6/06, mclaugb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone recompiled the Scientific Computing package using Nu
On 2/6/06, mclaugb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone recompiled the Scientific Computing package using NumPy instead
> of Numeric?
> I need a least squares algorithm and a Newton Rhaphson algorithm which is
> contained in Numeric but all the documentation out there says that Numeric
> is crap
20 matches
Mail list logo
