On May 6, 10:03 am, Aaron Watters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having trouble following your discussion
> and I suspect you might be a friend of Mark V Cheney.
> But I will focus on this one point.
>
> On May 5, 11:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If recursive generators are really useless
Aaron Watters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm having trouble following your discussion
> and I suspect you might be a friend of Mark V Cheney.
> But I will focus on this one point.
>
> On May 5, 11:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If recursive generators are really useless (erect wall might no
I'm having trouble following your discussion
and I suspect you might be a friend of Mark V Cheney.
But I will focus on this one point.
On May 5, 11:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If recursive generators are really useless (erect wall might not be),
I would like to have recursive generators --
On May 5, 6:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On May 5, 1:26 pm, Aaron Watters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi there. Maybe a little more context would
> > help us figure out what you want here...
>
> > On May 5, 1:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Is multimap just a syntax-check
On May 5, 1:26 pm, Aaron Watters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there. Maybe a little more context would
> help us figure out what you want here...
>
> On May 5, 1:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Is multimap just a syntax-checked dictionary of mutable sequences?
>
> I think the equivalent o
Hi there. Maybe a little more context would
help us figure out what you want here...
On May 5, 1:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is multimap just a syntax-checked dictionary of mutable sequences?
I think the equivalent of a multimap can be
implemented several different ways, depending on
what
