Re: reStructuredText format a part of a word

2010-06-25 Thread Slafs
On 25 Cze, 14:06, Thomas Jollans wrote: > On 06/25/2010 01:56 PM, Slafs wrote:> Hi there! > > > Is it possible to format a word using reStructuredText in a way that > > only a part of it is formatted (e.g. in bold)? > > > I would like to do something like this: > > > my l****ng word > > l\

Re: reStructuredText format a part of a word

2010-06-25 Thread Thomas Jollans
On 06/25/2010 01:56 PM, Slafs wrote: > Hi there! > > Is it possible to format a word using reStructuredText in a way that > only a part of it is formatted (e.g. in bold)? > > I would like to do something like this: > > my l****ng word l\ ****\ nger word? > > where all th

Re: restructuredText editor ?

2010-01-09 Thread Peter
On 01/09/2010 03:32 AM, Florian Diesch wrote: Peter writes: What editor do people out there use to edit .rst files for sphinx-python documentation ? Emacs with ReST mode and YASnippet Florian Great, works very well and thanks for mentionning YASnippets ( useful for many

Re: restructuredText editor ?

2010-01-08 Thread Florian Diesch
Peter writes: > What editor do people out there use to edit .rst files for > sphinx-python documentation ? Emacs with ReST mode and YASnippet Florian -- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: restructuredText editor ?

2010-01-08 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
Peter schrieb: What editor do people out there use to edit .rst files for sphinx-python documentation ? Emacs has a RST-mode (which unfortunately has some runtime-issues, the longer the text & the edit, the slower it gets), and together with flymake & rst2xml, you get nice error-notification

Re: restructuredtext latin1 encoding (FAQ?)

2007-07-03 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:12:04 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > >> Is there a way to write documents with the reST tools using the Latin1 >> encoding? > > Yes of course there is. Just write the documents in Latin-1 encoding. > Take a look at the charset command li

Re: restructuredtext latin1 encoding (FAQ?)

2007-07-03 Thread Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:12:04 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Is there a way to write documents with the reST tools using the Latin1 > encoding? Yes of course there is. Just write the documents in Latin-1 encoding. Take a look at the charset command line options if Latin-1 is not the default enc

Re: ReStructuredText

2006-08-15 Thread limodou
> Yeah, right after you asked, I tried 0.4, but it failed with a > traceback. But my version works good. > I ended up installing 0.3.9 and it works fine (and didn't > require the list to be indented either, FWIW). Yeah. > > For anyone who cares, the traceback with 0.4 was: > > Python 2.4.2 (#1,

Re: ReStructuredText

2006-08-15 Thread Cliff Wells
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 16:10 +0800, limodou wrote: > On 8/15/06, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 16:02 +0800, limodou wrote: > > > On 8/15/06, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the response. Must be a bug in my version: > > > > > > Which vers

Re: ReStructuredText

2006-08-15 Thread Cliff Wells
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 00:56 -0700, Cliff Wells wrote: Ah, I got it. From the docs: (Auto-enumerated lists are new in Docutils 0.3.8.) and I've got 0.3.7 Damn. Thanks for the responses. Regards, Cliff -- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: ReStructuredText

2006-08-15 Thread Cliff Wells
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 16:02 +0800, limodou wrote: > On 8/15/06, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the response. Must be a bug in my version: > > Which version of docutils you are using, in my computer is good. > > u'\nthis is a test\nthis is > another line\noh, screw it!\n\n'

Re: ReStructuredText

2006-08-15 Thread Cliff Wells
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 09:35 +0200, Sybren Stuvel wrote: > Cliff Wells enlightened us with: > > Why doesn't the above turn out an enumerated list? > > You have to indent the list: > > >>> from docutils.core import publish_parts > >>> t = ''' > ... > ...1. this is a test > ...#. this is an