On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:02:46PM -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
> The dot syntax works very
> predictably, and quite flexibly. The problem was that by using the same
> name for module and class, you didn't realize you needed to include both.
It is one of the hazards of working in many very differ
Dale Amon wrote:
The point I take away from this is that packages and
modules have dotted names, but Classes do not and there
is no way to do exactly what I wanted to do.
The dot syntax would have been quite nice (I quite like the
"::" syntax in Perl) and would have made the code much
clearer.
