On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:37:29 -0700, TUA wrote:
> My intention is to implement a max. length of 8 for an input string. The
> above works well in all other respects, but does allow for strings that
> are too long.
if len(input_string) > 8:
raise ValueError('string is too long')
--
Steve
--
On Apr 18, 2018 21:42, TUA wrote:
>
> import re
>
> compval = 'A123456_8'
> regex = '[a-zA-Z]\w{0,7}'
>
> if re.match(regex, compval):
>print('Yes')
> else:
>print('No')
>
>
> My intention is to implement a max. length of 8 for an input string. The
> above works well in all other respect
Thanks much!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Rob Gaddi
wrote:
> On 04/18/2018 12:37 PM, TUA wrote:
>>
>> import re
>>
>> compval = 'A123456_8'
>> regex = '[a-zA-Z]\w{0,7}'
>>
>> if re.match(regex, compval):
>> print('Yes')
>> else:
>> print('No')
>>
>>
>> My intention is to implement a max. length of
On 04/18/2018 12:37 PM, TUA wrote:
import re
compval = 'A123456_8'
regex = '[a-zA-Z]\w{0,7}'
if re.match(regex, compval):
print('Yes')
else:
print('No')
My intention is to implement a max. length of 8 for an input string. The above
works well in all other respects, but does allow for
Ed Leafe wrote:
You've missed the obvious: it's 'criticism' or 'observation' when it
comes from Doug, but it's a 'flame' when it is directed at Doug.
>
Unless there is something more substantial then whining, howzabout
we all just ignore it and let it die a quick death?
It's amazing how m
Steve Holden wrote:
> 'Scuse me? This group has a long history of off-topic posting, and
> anyway who decided that CPython should be the exclusive focus? Even
> on-topic we can talk about Jython and PyPy as well as CPython.
>
> Off-topic we can talk about what we damned well please. Even boo :-)
Th
Doug Holton wrote:
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
Doug Holton wrote:
Peter Hansen wrote:
As a result of all the activity in the "Boo who?" thread, however,
that you started
Apart from that it is considered disrespectful to put your "opponent's"
name into the subject, this flame war is biting its tail
On Dec 22, 2004, at 11:38 AM, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
Apart from that it is considered disrespectful to put your "opponent's"
name into the subject, this flame war is biting its tail already.
You've missed the obvious: it's 'criticism' or 'observation' when it
comes from Doug, but it's a 'flam
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
Doug Holton wrote:
Peter Hansen wrote:
As a result of all the activity in the "Boo who?" thread, however,
that you started
Apart from that it is considered disrespectful to put your "opponent's"
name into the subject, this flame war is biting its tail already.
So putting
Doug Holton wrote:
> Peter Hansen wrote:
>> Luis M. Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>>> As far as I could see, everythime the word "boo" is typed, some sort of
>>> censorship or plain bashing comes up, and I think this is not fair.
>>
>> I think doing this by defending Doug's postings, however, might weaken
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo
