> And that's a really sideways way to take a swipe at someone while
> pretending to be too high-minded to do it (plus see James's comments about
> other possible explanations). If you kiddies would take this fight out
> into the playground perhaps the rest of the class can continue.
It wasn't m
Scott wrote:
>
>> Please forgo the psychological self analysis from your future posts.
>
> Unfortunately I can't, that's how I am, love it or leave it. But if your
> going to be condescending about it, please leave your future replies in your
> outbox. Now don't take that as I don't appreciat
Scott wrote:
>>Please forgo the psychological self analysis from your future posts.
>
>
> Unfortunately I can't, that's how I am, love it or leave it. But if your
> going to be condescending about it, please leave your future replies in your
> outbox. Now don't take that as I don't appreciate
> Please forgo the psychological self analysis from your future posts.
Unfortunately I can't, that's how I am, love it or leave it. But if your
going to be condescending about it, please leave your future replies in your
outbox. Now don't take that as I don't appreciate your reply. I just d
On Apr 12, 3:29 pm, "Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry if most of my question's seem "petty", but as I've said before, I
> need to know the petty just because I need to know.
>
> This question is more along the lines of just having you guys either agree
> or disgree with me, and if disa
