On 11/02/2021 03.51, James Lu wrote:
> Directly removing the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) would break a lot
> of libraries that implicitly assume it is there. What if Python had
> "realms" that each had separate GILs?
>
> The "realms" (not sure if "subinterpreter" is the correct term here)
> coul
On 10Feb2021 21:51, James Lu wrote:
>Directly removing the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) would break a lot
>of libraries that implicitly assume it is there. What if Python had
>"realms" that each had separate GILs?
>
>The "realms" (not sure if "subinterpreter" is the correct term here)
>could shar
