On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Rob Gaddi
wrote:
> Sort of. If I've got a directory full of files (in a package)
> that I'm working on, the relative import semantics change based on
> whether I'm one directory up and importing the package or in the same
> directory and importing the files locall
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Rob Gaddi
wrote:
> Sort of. If I've got a directory full of files (in a package)
> that I'm working on, the relative import semantics change based on
> whether I'm one directory up and importing the package or in the same
> directory and importing the files locally
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Rob Gaddi
> wrote:
>> Rob Gaddi wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know the history of why relative imports are only available
>>> for packages and not for "programs"? It certainly complicates life.
>>>
>>
>> Really, no one? It seems like a fairly
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Rob Gaddi
wrote:
> Rob Gaddi wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know the history of why relative imports are only available
>> for packages and not for "programs"? It certainly complicates life.
>>
>
> Really, no one? It seems like a fairly obvious thing to have included;
>
Rob Gaddi wrote:
> Does anyone know the history of why relative imports are only available
> for packages and not for "programs"? It certainly complicates life.
>
Really, no one? It seems like a fairly obvious thing to have included;
all of the reasons that you want to be explicit in saying:
