On 7/18/2009 11:41 AM, Peter Chant wrote:
Max Erickson wrote:
More recent months contain updates to the status of 1.1.7, it is
headed towards a release. Preliminary tarballs and binaries are
available on effbot.org:
http://effbot.org/downloads/#imaging
http://effbot.org/downloads/#pil
Excell
Max Erickson wrote:
> More recent months contain updates to the status of 1.1.7, it is
> headed towards a release. Preliminary tarballs and binaries are
> available on effbot.org:
>
> http://effbot.org/downloads/#imaging
> http://effbot.org/downloads/#pil
Excellent. From a very brief look it se
Peter Chant wrote:
> No, it does not. However, if PIL was updated last in 2006.
> Python in 2009 has gone to version 3.1. If PIL is compatible
> with 3.1 then I'm fine. But I don't want to have to stick with
> Python 2.5 as the rest of the world moves on.
>
> Pete
>
>
Various messages to
Peter Chant wrote:
what do people generally use now?
I can only speak for myself... I use PIL ;-)
Greetings,
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Peter Chant wrote:
>
> No, it does not. However, if PIL was updated last in 2006. Python in
> 2009
> has gone to version 3.1. If PIL is compatible with 3.1 then I'm fine.
> But I don't want to have to stick with Python 2.5 as the rest of the world
> moves on.
BTW, this was not a critisism o
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Peter Chant <
rempete...@cappetezilla.italsco.uk> wrote:
> Michiel Overtoom wrote:
>
> > Peter Chant wrote:
> >
> >> what's the most appropriate (maintained) graphics library to use? PIL
> >> seems to have last been updated in 2006
> >> http://www.pythonware.com/p
Michiel Overtoom wrote:
> Peter Chant wrote:
>
>> what's the most appropriate (maintained) graphics library to use? PIL
>> seems to have last been updated in 2006
>> http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/
>> and GD seems to be even older. Don't want to go down a dead end.
>
> Contrary to orga
Peter Chant wrote:
what's the most appropriate (maintained) graphics library to use? PIL seems
to have last been updated in 2006 http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/
and GD seems to be even older. Don't want to go down a dead end.
Contrary to organic material, software doesn't rot when it
