>
> Heh, this somehow reminds me about the way shared libraries were
> implemented on the Amiga.
> No linking step; the function entry points were essentially a
> big jump table in the library structure with every function having
> a unique offset from the library's base.
> Proved to make it very
Ville Vainio wrote:
"Thomas" == Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (Yeah, ctypes will probably be a problem because of the way Symbian
>> handles DLLs)
Thomas> How *does* symbian handle DLLs?
By ordinal, so the dll does not include the symbol name (in order to
keep the size s
> "Thomas" == Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (Yeah, ctypes will probably be a problem because of the way Symbian
>> handles DLLs)
Thomas> How *does* symbian handle DLLs?
By ordinal, so the dll does not include the symbol name (in order to
keep the size small). Linke
Ville Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course there is the whole hog and more in the official Nokia press
> release, this time in English:
>
> http://press.nokia.com/PR/200501/978226_5.html
>
> It also paints an accurate and quite positive picture of Python. Now
> we just need ctypes or Sym
Of course there is the whole hog and more in the official Nokia press
release, this time in English:
http://press.nokia.com/PR/200501/978226_5.html
It also paints an accurate and quite positive picture of Python. Now
we just need ctypes or Symbianic Swig and world domination will be
ours ;-).
(Y
