On 7.2.2012 04:24, alex23 wrote:
Experience?
Are you seriously advocating something for which you've done nothing
more than watch a podcast?
No, I am not. If you reread my original post, you may find that I was
asking exactly for experience and explanation why something which seems
to me obv
On Feb 7, 8:03 am, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 6.2.2012 21:51, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > The 'TAP standard' is what the Perl TAP module does. There is a
> > pre-draft for an IETF standard. You could ask why Perl people don't care
> > about joining the unittest 'standard'.
>
> I don't think it is
> fair:h
On Feb 6, 10:58 am, Matej Cepl wrote:
> I have just finished listening to the FLOSS Weekly podcast #200
> (http://twit.tv/show/floss-weekly/200) on autotest, where I've learned
> about the existence of TAP (http://testanything.org/).
[...]
> What am I missing?
Experience?
Are you seriously adv
On 6.2.2012 21:51, Terry Reedy wrote:
The 'TAP standard' is what the Perl TAP module does. There is a
pre-draft for an IETF standard. You could ask why Perl people don't care
about joining the unittest 'standard'.
I don't think it is fair:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_Anything_Protocol#Ex
On 2/6/2012 7:24 AM, Frank Becker wrote:
On 06.02.12 01:58, Matej Cepl wrote:
I have just finished listening to the FLOSS Weekly podcast #200
(http://twit.tv/show/floss-weekly/200) on autotest, where I've learned
about the existence of TAP (http://testanything.org/). A standardization
of testi
On 06.02.12 01:58, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
> I have just finished listening to the FLOSS Weekly podcast #200
> (http://twit.tv/show/floss-weekly/200) on autotest, where I've learned
> about the existence of TAP (http://testanything.org/). A standardization
> of testing seems to be so obviously The
