You are completely right wihtin this. It's some time i didn't reply, but
i've taken a look on pyrex and swig now which did cost me some time, and
they really make it easier. SWIG provides more possibilities and bindings
for other languages too, though - i must say i've been faster with pyrex,
for s
STiAT wrote:
> Why do you all suggest other things than the way suggested by python?
Because going to Paris is not the only way to get french bread?
Why would you want to write all that ugly glue code by hand that Pyrex
generates for free? Module descriptors? Class descriptors? Method descriptors
Hello,
I've basically had plans on just extending python for the wrapper.
That basically works fine, i just don't get along by the types
provided (http://docs.python.org/ext/ext.html).
Anyway, i want to extend python for types. The problem i currently
experience is the following.
Guess what - i
Georg Grabler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a C library which i'd like to have python bindings for. I havn't
> known anything before about how to write python bindings for a C library.
>
> I succeeded now by using distutils to write the first bindings for functions
> and similar.
>
>
Stefan Behnel schrieb:
> Georg Grabler wrote:
>
>> There's a C library which i'd like to have python bindings for. I havn't
>> known anything before about how to write python bindings for a C library.
>>
>> I succeeded now by using distutils to write the first bindings for functions
>> and simil
Stefan Behnel schrieb:
> Georg Grabler wrote:
>
>> There's a C library which i'd like to have python bindings for. I havn't
>> known anything before about how to write python bindings for a C library.
>>
>> I succeeded now by using distutils to write the first bindings for functions
>> and simil
Georg Grabler wrote:
> There's a C library which i'd like to have python bindings for. I havn't
> known anything before about how to write python bindings for a C library.
>
> I succeeded now by using distutils to write the first bindings for functions
> and similar.
>
> Now, it seems as somethin
