In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>To try and ensure this thread dies for ever, I have added a note to the
>blog entry at
>
> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
>
>noting the fact that this was indeed an April Fool's joke.
Steve Holden
>> It was an April Fool's joke. It's not actually true.
>>
> To try and ensure this thread dies for ever, I have added a note to the
> blog entry at
>
> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
>
> noting the fact that this was indeed an April Fool's j
Robert Kern wrote:
> Francisco Reyes wrote:
>
>>Shane Hathaway writes:
>>
>>
>>>I must saay that i am fully in favor of this change. The ppython
>>>developerrs need to eat too. Iis no one ellse aware off the perils oof
>>>ooutright open source llicenssing?
>>
>>I disagree with the change. I th
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Shane Hathaway writes:
>
>>I must saay that i am fully in favor of this change. The ppython
>>developerrs need to eat too. Iis no one ellse aware off the perils oof
>>ooutright open source llicenssing?
>
> I disagree with the change. I think Steve Holden is right.
>
Shane Hathaway writes:
> I must saay that i am fully in favor of this change. The ppython
> developerrs need to eat too. Iis no one ellse aware off the perils oof
> ooutright open source llicenssing?
I disagree with the change. I think Steve Holden is right.
1- How do you enforce this?
2- Th
Philippe Martin wrote:
> That was nasty Steve - at least I'm ready for any kind of bad new today ;-)
>
Sorry ;-)
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd www.holdenweb.com
Love me, love my blog holdenweb.blogspot.com
--
That was nasty Steve - at least I'm ready for any kind of bad new today ;-)
Regards,
Philippe
Steve Holden wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described
> in
>
>http://pyfound.b
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
>recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
>
>I would like to place on reco
"walterbyrd" wrote:
> Please post a link to the original article. Not just a post to a blog.
the pyfound blog is the official PSF blog; it's linked from the PSF:s
homepage:
http://www.python.org/psf/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve Holden wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2006-04-01, walterbyrd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Is this an April fool's joke?
> >
> >
> > Did you read the blog entry?
> >
> I suspect he didn't. I'm guessing that eventually we'll have to remove
> the blog entry just so's nobobdy's t
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2006-04-01, walterbyrd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Is this an April fool's joke?
>
>
> Did you read the blog entry?
>
I suspect he didn't. I'm guessing that eventually we'll have to remove
the blog entry just so's nobobdy's tempted to take it seriously.
regards
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2006-04-01, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
>>recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>>
>> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-
Grant Edwards a écrit :
> On 2006-04-01, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
>>recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>>
>> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensi
On 2006-04-01, walterbyrd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this an April fool's joke?
Did you read the blog entry?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I will invent "TIDY
at BOWL"...
visi.com
Is this an April fool's joke?
Please post a link to the original article. Not just a post to a blog.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
>
>Hmmm... after due consideration (and reading the announcmement
>properly), I support this license change in full.
>
>
>
If I could read past the first paragraph do you think I would really
hang onto this newsgroup asking stupid questions?!
The personal harm caused readers of this announc
Fuzzyman wrote:
>
From the site:
"Advanced Program for Research In Licensing, whose First Object-Oriented
License"
string = "Advanced Program for Research In Licensing, whose First
Object-Oriented License"
for letter in string:
if ord(letter) in range(65,91):
print(letter),
--
That isn't in the published 2.5 License.
http://docs.python.org/dev/ref/node110.html
Thanks for the scare..
~r
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
>http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.
On 2006-04-01, Piet van Oostrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (F) wrote:
>
>>F> Can I ask for clarification. The charge applies to any commercial use
>>F> of a derivative work based on the Python source code ?
>
>>F> Normal applications that use Python, including
On 2006-04-01, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
>http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
Good one Steve
Look at the date.
Worry about this if it is still around tomarrow
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Aww, but I liked the idea of copying Perl 6 REs, and porting python to
> the toy CPU :-)
I think if PSF is going to support porting of Python to "toy" CPUs then
the Digi-Comp should be the first target. This will breathe new life
into these toys which for years have be
Ivan Herman>I would certainly look at *all details* of the
announcement,<
Aww, but I liked the idea of copying Perl 6 REs, and porting python to
the toy CPU :-)
(But making strings mutable sounds too much strange).
Bye and thank you,
bearophile
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
I would certainly look at *all details* of the announcement, including
the second line from the top which gives the date:-)
Ivan
Caleb Hattingh wrote:
> WAIT-
>
> Did I just get caught by an April Fools Joke?
>
> I have a nasty feeling about this :))
>
> C
>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailma
> "Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (F) wrote:
>F> Can I ask for clarification. The charge applies to any commercial use
>F> of a derivative work based on the Python source code ?
>F> Normal applications that use Python, including bunding the standard
>F> CPython as an executable, using tools li
WAIT-
Did I just get caught by an April Fools Joke?
I have a nasty feeling about this :))
C
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve
I agree with you. If my vote means anything, I vote against it.
>> The Board realises that this change will be
>> contentious. There are many advantages
>> to making it, however, which we feel will
>> benefit the Python community at large
>> and the PSF membership in particular.
>> Users w
Fuzzyman wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
> > As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> > recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
> >
> >http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
> >
> > I would like to
Steve Holden wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
>http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
>
> I would like to place on record my protest aga
Steve Holden wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
>http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
I must saay that i am fully in favor of this cha
Steve Holden wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
>http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
>
> I would like to place on record my protest aga
I say good riddence. Python's success has always been on its merits as
an open source application platform. Corprate usage has always been
relatively insignificant, and I suspect that many companies are
overrepresenting the level of dependance they have on python in an
attempt to steer their compet
33 matches
Mail list logo
