Re: Python 2.5 alpha

2005-09-18 Thread Fredrik Lundh
"D Hering" wrote: > I just installed 2.5a0 what part of aahz's "There is no Python 2.5 alpha" did you not understand? > in an alternative directory (make altinstall) which > build and tested out fine. I'm gonna now attempt to compile the module > packages mentioned above. I'll report how it turn

Re: Python 2.5 alpha

2005-09-18 Thread D.Hering
So far so good. Numeric-24.0b2, numarray-1.3.3, pytables-1.1.1 (gonna wait alittle on the scipy install) all built. Tests passed except one trivial test in numarray but does function: 1 items had failures: 1 of 1205 in cache pass ***Test Failed*** 1 failures. File "/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site

Re: Python 2.5 alpha

2005-09-18 Thread D.Hering
Hi Aahz, Yes thank you. To clarify the cvs dist README listed Python version 2.5 alpha 0. I should have realized before posting that replacing was a bad idea and another "slot-ed" version could be installed (package manager already has 2.3.5 & 2.4.1). I just installed 2.5a0 in an alternative direct

Re: Python 2.5 alpha

2005-09-18 Thread Thomas Jollans
D.Hering wrote: > under gentoo linux 2.6. that does not exist. gentoo labels installers 2005.0 etc, but I have never heard of version numbers. do you mean gentoo with linux 2.6 ? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python 2.5 alpha

2005-09-17 Thread Aahz
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, D.Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Generally, what sort of compatibility problems should I expect if I >were to replace 2.4.1 with 2.5 alpha (current cvs dist)? I'm working >under gentoo linux 2.6. There is no Python 2.5 alpha. There is CVS head, which is curre