Re: Python, qt, and lgpl

2009-08-26 Thread Carl Banks
On Aug 25, 5:04 pm, sturlamolden wrote: > On 25 Aug, 21:45, Terry Reedy wrote: > > > Will be good news if realized. > > Good news for everyone except Riverbank. Oh well, Riverbank could have played ball but they didn't, so I guess I don't care if it's bad news for them. Carl Banks -- http://m

Re: Python, qt, and lgpl

2009-08-26 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
sturlamolden schrieb: On 25 Aug, 21:45, Terry Reedy wrote: Will be good news if realized. Good news for everyone except Riverbank. And only if LGPL is something you can live with. Some projects require more liberal licenses. Or is there a commercial license available, too? Diez --

Re: Python, qt, and lgpl

2009-08-25 Thread sturlamolden
On 25 Aug, 21:45, Terry Reedy wrote: > Will be good news if realized. Good news for everyone except Riverbank. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list