On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 1, 6:55�pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Steven D'Aprano:
>>
>> > productory() -- I don't know that function, and googling mostly comes up
>> > with retail product searches. Do you mean product(),
>>
>> Darn my English, y
On Sep 1, 2:15�pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have just re-read the list of changes in Python 2.6, it's huge,
> there are tons of changes and improvements, I'm really
> impressed:http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.6.html
>
> I'll need many days to learn all those changes! I can see it fixes
>
On Sep 1, 6:55�pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano:
>
> > productory() -- I don't know that function, and googling mostly comes up
> > with retail product searches. Do you mean product(),
>
> Darn my English, you are right, sorry, I meant a product() of
> course :-)
But the name product
Steven D'Aprano:
> productory() -- I don't know that function, and googling mostly comes up
> with retail product searches. Do you mean product(),
Darn my English, you are right, sorry, I meant a product() of
course :-)
Bye,
bearophile
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:15:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
> Now math has factorial:
> http://docs.python.org/dev/library/math.html#math.factorial Seen how
> reduce() is removed from Python 3 (I know it's in itertools), and seeing
> that for me to write a productory() function was the first usage I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now math has factorial:
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/math.html#math.factorial
That's rather underdocumented.
Does it really attempt exact calculation
for arbitrary integers?? Is there any
way to request a nice fast approximation
for large integers (e.g., with Gos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I presume it's better for me to not hold my breath while I wait
CPython to be written in C99 :-)
First you have to convince Microsoft to release C99 compiler ... good luck!
Christian
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
