Chris Lambacher wrote:
> > > I'm just a bit loathe to download and install more stuff when
> > > something simpler appears to be near-at-hand. ...especially
> > > considering the page describing this module doesn't offer any download
> > > links! http://python-mock.sourceforge.net/
>
> Oh yeah,
> > I'm just a bit loathe to download and install more stuff when
> > something simpler appears to be near-at-hand. ...especially
> > considering the page describing this module doesn't offer any download
> > links! http://python-mock.sourceforge.net/
> How about mini-mock:
> http://blog.ianbicki
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 05:00:32PM -0800, Tom Plunket wrote:
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
> > > I've got a bunch of code that runs under a bunch of unit tests. It'd
> > > be really handy if when testing I could supply replacement
> > > functionality to verify that the right things get called wi
