[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you change it to this it works. You should provide a get and a set
> function for a property.
The OP did:
-> command=property(getCommand, setNothing)
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PRO
Michael Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to all, I added the object as a subclass (should this be
> required for 2.4.1 ???)
It _IS_ required, because Python these days moves *very slowly indeed*
before changing semantics of existing code in any way that is not
backwards compatible
Thanks to all, I added the object as a subclass (should this be
required for 2.4.1 ???)
I also switched to the decorator with the @property syntax
Thank you very much for the help for adding @property to the language.
what a great language :-)
Mike
Michael Schneider wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
Thanks to all, I added the object as a subclass (should this be
required for 2.4.1 ???)
I also switched to the decorator with the @property syntax
Thank you very much for the help for adding @property to the language.
what a great language :-)
Mike
Michael Schneider wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
Michael Schneider wrote:
> Could someone please point out my error, I have dents in my forehead
> for this one.
> --
>
> from unittest import TestCase
> import unittest
Here you need to add:
__metaclass__ = type
this will make you
Michael Schneider wrote:
> Rather then dispatching the property assignment to setNothing, the
> property object is being replaced with a string.
properties are for newstyle classes only (i. e. classes that inherit from
object).
from unittest import TestCase
import unittest
class Task(object):
I was thinking that in Python2.4, all class definitions inherited from
new-style classes. There may be a bug here. I can make your code work
as expected by changing the class definition to:
class Task(object):
with that change, the assignment raises an attribute error. You could
also accomplish
Michael Schneider wrote:
> The get property access is working, but the the set
> property is not working.
The classes need to be "new style" for properties to work right. Just
change "class Task:" to "class Task(object):".
Your "setNothing" method is unnecessary, if you don't proved a "setter"
If you change it to this it works. You should provide a get and a set
function for a property.
class Task:
def __init__(self, value):
self._command = value
def setCommand(self, value):
self._command = value
def getCommand(self):
return self._command
command=property(
If you change it to this it works. You should provide a get and a set
function for a property.
class Task:
def __init__(self, value):
self._command = value
def setCommand(self, value):
self._command = value
def getCommand(self):
return self._command
command=property(
10 matches
Mail list logo
