On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Kev Dwyer wrote:
>
> 2009/11/21 Victor Subervi
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Kev Dwyer wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:19:52 -0500, Victor Subervi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Victor,
>>>
>>> The information that you have sent comes from the client side of t
2009/11/21 Victor Subervi
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Kev Dwyer wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:19:52 -0500, Victor Subervi wrote:
>>
>> Hello Victor,
>>
>> The information that you have sent comes from the client side of the
>> transaction, so it isn't possible to tell why the server
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Kev Dwyer wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:19:52 -0500, Victor Subervi wrote:
>
> Hello Victor,
>
> The information that you have sent comes from the client side of the
> transaction, so it isn't possible to tell why the server disconnected.
> Assuming that there
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:19:52 -0500, Victor Subervi wrote:
Hello Victor,
The information that you have sent comes from the client side of the
transaction, so it isn't possible to tell why the server disconnected.
Assuming that there is an SMTP server listening on port 25, you need to
check the