On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 11:08:13 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> I tend to view name mangling as being more for avoiding internal
>> attribute collisions in complex inheritance structures than for
>> designating names as private.
>
> Really? I tend
alex23 writes:
> On 10 Oct, 17:03, real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M.
> Procida) wrote:
>> It certainly makes it quick to build a class with the attributes I need,
>> but it does make tracing logic sometimes a pain in the neck.
>>
>> I don't know what the alternative is though.
>
D.M. Procida於 2012年10月9日星期二UTC+8下午9時24分30秒寫道：
> What exactly is the point of a private method? Why or when would I want
>
Private methods in the object level are searched first
in the run time of python interpreter.
I did turn some private methods in to c programs from time to time.
--
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:34:01 -0700, alex23 wrote:
> On 10 Oct, 17:03, real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M.
> Procida) wrote:
>> It certainly makes it quick to build a class with the attributes I
>> need, but it does make tracing logic sometimes a pain in the neck.
>>
>> I don't know
On 11 Oct, 02:14, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> What language?
I think he's objecting to "bitch".
I had to block him on G+ because he kept asking me to self-censor
posts that he had _chosen to read_.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10 Oct, 17:03, real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M.
Procida) wrote:
> It certainly makes it quick to build a class with the attributes I need,
> but it does make tracing logic sometimes a pain in the neck.
>
> I don't know what the alternative is though.
Components.
The examples
On 2012-10-10, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 16:56, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 10 October 2012 18:38:04 UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
>>> Public: I hereby declare that this method or attribute is part of the
>>> promised never to change interface of this class. I might possibly
On 10/10/2012 16:56, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 October 2012 18:38:04 UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
Public: I hereby declare that this method or attribute is part of the
promised never to change interface of this class. I might possibly
break that promise at some point in the future,
On Wednesday, 10 October 2012 18:38:04 UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article
>
> <1krpdak.u0qy9e1a4knspn%real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk>,
>
> real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M. Procida) wrote:
>
>
>
> > Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > On 09/10/2012 14:
In article
<1krpdak.u0qy9e1a4knspn%real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk>,
real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M. Procida) wrote:
> Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> > On 09/10/2012 14:24, D.M. Procida wrote:
> > > What exactly is the point of a private method? Why or when would I wa
On 10/10/12 12:51 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 11:08:13 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Demian Brecht
wrote:
A single underscore semantically means private. A double underscore
will name mangle the function such that it's only accessible strictly
by n
Demian Brecht wrote:
> On 12-10-09 04:51 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > Really? I tend to view name mangling as a waste of time, and complex
> > inheritance structures as something to avoid.
>
> Yep, I've been coming around to this as of late.
I have a lot of inheritance. I don't know whether y
On 12-10-09 04:51 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Really? I tend to view name mangling as a waste of time, and complex
inheritance structures as something to avoid.
Yep, I've been coming around to this as of late.
--
Demian Brecht
@demianbrecht
http://demianbrecht.github.com
--
http://mail.python.o
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 11:08:13 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Demian Brecht
> wrote:
>> A single underscore semantically means private. A double underscore
>> will name mangle the function such that it's only accessible strictly
>> by name through the class that it's defi
On 10/09/12 08:59, D.M. Procida wrote:
>> On 09/10/2012 14:24, D.M. Procida wrote:
>>> What exactly is the point of a private method? Why or when would I want
>>> to use one?
>
> In Python, using an underscore is simply a convention to note that a
> method is private - it doesn't actually hide it
On 10/9/12 2:59 PM, D.M. Procida wrote:
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 09/10/2012 14:24, D.M. Procida wrote:
What exactly is the point of a private method? Why or when would I want
to use one?
Daniele
Hardly a Python question but using a search engine could have got you
here, and rather faster :
On 12-10-09 06:59 AM, D.M. Procida wrote:
In Python, using an underscore is simply a convention to note that a
method is private - it doesn't actually hide it from other things -
correct?
Daniele
A single underscore semantically means private. A double underscore will
name mangle the functio
Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 14:24, D.M. Procida wrote:
> > What exactly is the point of a private method? Why or when would I want
> > to use one?
> >
> > Daniele
> >
>
> Hardly a Python question but using a search engine could have got you
> here, and rather faster :)
>
http://stackov
On 09/10/2012 14:24, D.M. Procida wrote:
What exactly is the point of a private method? Why or when would I want
to use one?
Daniele
Hardly a Python question but using a search engine could have got you
here, and rather faster :)
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2620699/why-private-method
19 matches
Mail list logo
