On Jan 28, 9:34 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:21:05 -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
> > Perl 6, on the other hand, is still fantasyware a decade after its
> > announcement. It is, for the most part, THE canonical example of the
> > wrong way to conduct a development effort.
>
> Ou
geremy condra wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, and completely off-topic, why has Perl 6 gone so badly?
>
> Too much like Perl.
I was going to suggest that it's probably due to the multitude of ways
to it could be done :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-li
