Skip Montanaro wrote:
> I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the
> reasons the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions
> > 9. There are too many similar assumptions about version numbers out in
> the real world.
Which is why there will be no Windo
On 2/12/2015 11:16 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
Things break down again when we get to Python XIX.
'XVIII' < 'XIX'
False
Looks to me like you better check if your PEP313 patch is installed
properly. :)
Emile
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2015-02-12 12:16, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >> It still becomes an issue when we get to Python 10.
> >>
> > Just call it Python X! :-)
>
> Things break down again when we get to Python XIX.
>
> >>> 'XVIII' < 'XIX'
> False
You know what this sub-thread gives me? The icks.
https://www.youtube.com/wat
On 12/02/2015 19:16, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:58 AM, MRAB wrote:
On 2015-02-12 17:35, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
wrote:
I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the
reasons
the Python-dev gang decided that th
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:58 AM, MRAB wrote:
> On 2015-02-12 17:35, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the
>>> reasons
>>> the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no mi
On 2015-02-12 17:35, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
wrote:
I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the reasons
the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions > 9. There
are too many similar assumptions about version
On 2015-02-12 18:37, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Tim Chase wrote:> So the test should actually be something like
>
> >if LooseVersion(QtCore.PYQT_VERSION_STR) <
> > LooseVersion("4.10"): balk()
>
> That's exactly what they do now in IPython/utils/version.py with
> the comment:
>Utilities for ver
Tim Chase wrote:> So the test should actually be something like
if LooseVersion(QtCore.PYQT_VERSION_STR) < LooseVersion("4.10"):
balk()
That's exactly what they do now in IPython/utils/version.py with
the comment:
Utilities for version comparison
It is a bit ridiculous that we need
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
wrote:
> I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the reasons
> the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions > 9. There
> are too many similar assumptions about version numbers out in the real
> world.
I
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
wrote:
> I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the reasons
> the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions > 9. There
> are too many similar assumptions about version numbers out in the real
> world.
I
I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the
reasons the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions >
9. There are too many similar assumptions about version numbers out in the
real world.
Skip
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2015-02-12 17:45, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> I tried using Interactive Python with a PyQt4 console:
>"IPython.exe qtconsole"
>
> But got a
>"ImportError: IPython requires PyQT4 >= 4.7, found 4.10.4"
>
> Looking at Ipython's check (in
> site-packages\IPython\external\qt.py): if QtCore.PYQT_VE
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Looking at Ipython's check (in site-packages\IPython\external\qt.py):
> if QtCore.PYQT_VERSION_STR < '4.7':
> raise ImportError("IPython requires PyQt4 >= 4.7, found
> %s"%QtCore.PYQT_VERSION_STR)
>
> So even if '4.10' < '4.7', my '4.10
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> I tried using Interactive Python with a PyQt4 console:
> "IPython.exe qtconsole"
>
> But got a
> "ImportError: IPython requires PyQT4 >= 4.7, found 4.10.4"
>
> Looking at Ipython's check (in site-packages\IPython\external\qt.py):
> if QtC
14 matches
Mail list logo
