On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:01:40 -, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Mar 26, 4:21 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
A few more comments, based on your code.
> def __classdef_integer(self):
Double-underscore name mangling is often more trouble than it is worth.
Unless you really need it, not just think you
Hi there,
First of all, thanks to everyone for replying. This has been a great
help.
On Mar 26, 4:21 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:36:49 -0700, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > My question is: why has 'parent_struct_sig' changed? I was under the
> > impression the assignment operator
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:36:49 -0700, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> My first post here, so hello :)
Hello and welcome. Let me comment on a few things out of order.
> My question is: why has 'parent_struct_sig' changed? I was under the
> impression the assignment operator copies, not referen
But you didn't do an assignment, you did an append. Append modifies the
object, which is referenced by both parent_struct_sig and
this_cdata["struct-sig"]
If you're sure you want a *copy* of the list before the modifications,
you might do something like
parent_struct_sig = \
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:36 -0700, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> My first post here, so hello :)
>
> Just a little background, I am writing my dissertation, which is a JIT
> compiler based upon LLVM and it's python bindings, along with the
> aperiot LL(1) parser.
>
> I have some code here,
