"ajaksu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And to answer your question, I recommend to follow standards because
> that's how I call the mixed bag of Recommendations, some of which are
> also Specifications, allowing for the inclusion of both significant
> Standards and standards. I guess I must've been
John Bokma wrote:
> "ajaksu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Don't :)
> > Even Firefox developers will tell you to avoid this. Develop for
> > standards compliant browsers (including Firefox) by testing against
> > the standards. Neither your HTML or CSS pass validation, both due to
> > minor, eas
Gabriel Genellina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Monday 14/8/2006 18:45, John Bokma wrote:
>
>> > Even Firefox developers will tell you to avoid this. Develop for
>> > standards compliant browsers (including Firefox) by testing against
>> > the standards. Neither your HTML or CSS pass validation
At Monday 14/8/2006 18:45, John Bokma wrote:
> Even Firefox developers will tell you to avoid this. Develop for
> standards compliant browsers (including Firefox) by testing against
> the standards. Neither your HTML or CSS pass validation, both due to
> minor, easy-to-fix issues.
If you actual
"ajaksu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't :)
> Even Firefox developers will tell you to avoid this. Develop for
> standards compliant browsers (including Firefox) by testing against
> the standards. Neither your HTML or CSS pass validation, both due to
> minor, easy-to-fix issues.
If you actual
