Roel Schroeven schreef:
> import time
>
> input_files = ["./test_file0.txt", "./test_file1.txt"]
>
> total_start = time.time()
> data = {}
> for input_fn in input_files:
> file_start = time.time()
> f = file(input_fn, 'r')
> data[input_fn] = f.read()
> f.close()
> file_do
Jeroen Hegeman schreef:
> Thanks for the comments,
>
>> (First, I had to add timing code to ReadClasses: the code you posted
>> doesn't include them, and only shows timings for ReadLines.)
>>
>> Your program uses quite a bit of memory. I guess it gets harder and
>> harder to allocate the required
On Sep 25, 1:51 am, Jeroen Hegeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your code does NOT include any statements that could have produced the
> > above line of output -- IOW, you have not posted the code that you
> > actually ran.
>
> Oh my, I must have cleaned it up a bit too much, hoping that people
>
Two comments,
> ...
> self.item3 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
> self.item4 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
> self.item5 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
> self.item6 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
> ...
this here (and your code in general) is mind boggling and not in a
good way,
as for you original question, I don't think that read
>
> Your code does NOT include any statements that could have produced the
> above line of output -- IOW, you have not posted the code that you
> actually ran.
Oh my, I must have cleaned it up a bit too much, hoping that people
would focus on the issue instead of the formatting of the output
Thanks for the comments,
>
> (First, I had to add timing code to ReadClasses: the code you posted
> doesn't include them, and only shows timings for ReadLines.)
>
> Your program uses quite a bit of memory. I guess it gets harder and
> harder to allocate the required amounts of memory.
Well, I gue
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gabriel
Genellina wrote:
> En Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:34:40 -0300, Jeroen Hegeman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi�:
>
>> class ModerateClass:
>> def __init__(self):
>> return
>> def __del__(self):
>> pass
>> return
>>
>> class HugeCla
Jeroen Hegeman schreef:
> ...processing all 2 files found
> --> 1/2: ./test_file0.txt
> Now reading ...
> DEBUG readLines A took 0.093 s
> ...took 8.85717201233 seconds
> --> 2/2: ./test_file0.txt
> Now reading ...
> DEBUG readLines A took 3.917 s
> ...took 12.8725550175 seconds
>
> So the first t
En Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:34:40 -0300, Jeroen Hegeman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi�:
> So the first time around the file gets read in in ~0.1 seconds, the
> second time around it needs almost four seconds! As far as I can see
> this is related to 'something in memory being copied around' since if
>
On Sep 22, 2:34 am, Jeroen Hegeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> ...processing all 2 files found
> --> 1/2: ./test_file0.txt
> Now reading ...
> DEBUG readLines A took 0.093 s
> ...took 8.85717201233 seconds
Your code does NOT include any statements that could have produced the
above line of
10 matches
Mail list logo
