Thanks again and sorry about the lack of examples. It didn't even occur
to me that my example wasn't comprehensive enough when I posted my
first message but I can see the issue now.
Your solution is really helpful for me to see. I can't tell you how
much I apprecaite it. I thought that adding more
On Wed, 03 May 2006 10:29:55 -0700, ProvoWallis wrote:
> I only have one issue that I can't figure out. When I print the new
> string I'm getting all of the values in the lt list rather than just
> the one that corresponds to the original entry.
I did not realize that each entry would have its own
Thanks very much for this I really appreciate it. I've pasted what I've
got now thanks to you.
I only have one issue that I can't figure out. When I print the new
string I'm getting all of the values in the lt list rather than just
the one that corresponds to the original entry.
E.g.,
My origina
On Tue, 02 May 2006 22:37:04 -0700, ProvoWallis wrote:
> I have a file that looks like this:
>
> APPEAL40-24; 40-46; 42-46; 42-48; 42-62; 42-63 PROC
> GUIDE921(b)(1)
>
> (i.e., <[chapter name][multiple or single book page
> ranges][chapter name][multiple or single book page
> ranges][code]
>
> b
