En Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:31:53 -0300, Sean McIlroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> On Feb 17, 9:59 pm, "Deron Meranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> this may be really dense, but i'm curious what's wrong with the
> "multiplexer" idiom:
>
> for item in some_sequence:
> item2 = (no
On Feb 17, 9:59 pm, "Deron Meranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
this may be really dense, but i'm curious what's wrong with the
"multiplexer" idiom:
for item in some_sequence:
item2 = (not some_rare_condition and item) or \
(some_rare_condition and
some_transform_fun
On Feb 18, 5:59 am, "Deron Meranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consider a much-simplified example of such an iteration where
> sometimes you need to transform an item by some function, but most of
> the time you don't:
>
> if some_rare_condition:
> func = some_transform_function
>
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 22:19:41 -0800, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> [Deron Meranda
>>] I'm looking for something in
>> Python which would act like an identity operator, or I-combinator: a
>> do-nothing function. The best I know of is: (lambda x: x), but it is
>> not ideal.
>
> File a feature reques
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:59:18 -0800, Deron Meranda wrote:
> Consider a much-simplified example of such an iteration where
> sometimes you need to transform an item by some function, but most of
> the time you don't:
>
> if some_rare_condition:
> func = some_transform_function
> els
[Deron Meranda
>] I'm looking for something in
> Python which would act like an identity operator, or I-combinator: a
> do-nothing function. The best I know of is: (lambda x: x), but it is
> not ideal.
File a feature request on SourceForge and assign to me. This has come
up a couple of times a
"Deron Meranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> do_transform = some_rare_condition
> for item in some_sequence:
> if do_transform:
> item2 = transform_function(item)
> else:
> item2 = item
> . # more stuff
This might be a little more direct
