> What I meant was that you would have a dict of dicts, where the key was the
> country:
Thanks MRAB I could not see that solution. That save me a lot of lines of code.
Certainly my previous solution also manage to do that but yours is more
clean-code wise.
This email is confidential and may be
On 2016-06-14 21:06, Joaquin Alzola wrote:
> >> The dictionary that I am using in the classes:
> >> {'Country':'Empty','Service':'Empty','TimeStamp':'Empty','Ocg':'see3',
> >> 'DiameterCodes':{'2001':0,'4010':0,'4012':0,'4998':0,'4999':0,'5007':0
> >> ,'5012':0}}
> >>
> >> Wanted help from your si
>> The dictionary that I am using in the classes:
>> {'Country':'Empty','Service':'Empty','TimeStamp':'Empty','Ocg':'see3',
>> 'DiameterCodes':{'2001':0,'4010':0,'4012':0,'4998':0,'4999':0,'5007':0
>> ,'5012':0}}
>>
>> Wanted help from your side on how to focus this just because I want to read
>>
On 2016-06-14 17:53, Joaquin Alzola wrote:
Hi Guys
I am doing program that reads into a directory for the files that were created
the last 5 mins. (working)
Inside those files there are 242 fields in each line separated by | (pipe).
Each file has about 5k records and there are about 5 files
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Someone Something wrote:
> I was trying to write a program with just one class and it was working fine.
> Then, I seperated that class into two different files and made the objects
> and called the methods in a third (client.py IO.py main.py). Now, when I use
> the
