On Wednesday 13 June 2007 4:04 am, Duncan Booth wrote:
> "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But you already have "multiline" lambdas right now in that sense, no
> > need to add anything. I think you were talking about lambdas *with*
> > statements inside.
> >
> > bin = lambda x:((
"Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But you already have "multiline" lambdas right now in that sense, no
> need to add anything. I think you were talking about lambdas *with*
> statements inside.
>
> bin = lambda x:((x&8 and '*' or '_') +
> (x&4 and '*' or '_') +
>
En Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:48:41 -0300, Josh Gilbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Guido doesn't want multiline lambdas, that's a really good reason not to
> add
> them. They are, on the other hand, very useful at times. Even if he did
> add
> multiline lambdas it's not certain that he would a
On 12 Jun., 20:17, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 11:36 am, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 12 Jun., 16:54, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 12, 10:12 am, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > On 12 Jun., 14:57, Facundo
--- Josh Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know that the standard Python response is that you
> might as well define a
> function, indeed, the name might provide useful
> documentation. In reality,
> however, the vast majority of my anonymous functions
> are callbacks (tends to
> lead to na
On 6/12/07, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Gilbert wrote:
> I don't expect multiline lambdas to be added to Python. I'm not so sure
that
> that's a bad thing. Regardless, isn't it possible to write your own
Yes, it is a bad thing.
Why? Because it would another way to do somet
On Jun 12, 11:36 am, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 Jun., 16:54, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 12, 10:12 am, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On 12 Jun., 14:57, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Remember that the *only*
On 12 Jun., 16:54, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 10:12 am, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 12 Jun., 14:57, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Remember that the *only* difference between the two functions is that
> > > one is anonymous, and fo
On Jun 12, 10:12 am, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 Jun., 14:57, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Remember that the *only* difference between the two functions is that
> > one is anonymous, and for other you have to came up with a name (name
> > that if is well thou
On 12 Jun., 14:57, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remember that the *only* difference between the two functions is that
> one is anonymous, and for other you have to came up with a name (name
> that if is well thought, actually adds readibility to your code).
The difference is that
Josh Gilbert wrote:
> I don't expect multiline lambdas to be added to Python. I'm not so sure that
> that's a bad thing. Regardless, isn't it possible to write your own
Yes, it is a bad thing.
Why? Because it would another way to do something you can do in other
way.
The *only* big value of lam
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:29:31 -0700, exhuma.twn wrote
> lambdas are to be removed in Py3k IIRC.
No. From http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3099/, "At one point lambda was
slated for removal in Python 3000. Unfortunately no one was able to come up
with a better way of providing anonymous functions.
On Jun 12, 5:57 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> En Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:02:37 -0300, Josh Gilbert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > I don't expect multiline lambdas to be added to Python. I'm not so sure
> > that
> > that's a bad thing. Regardless, isn't it possible to write
En Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:02:37 -0300, Josh Gilbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I don't expect multiline lambdas to be added to Python. I'm not so sure
> that
> that's a bad thing. Regardless, isn't it possible to write your own
> implementation of multiline lambdas as functions? Wouldn't tha
14 matches
Mail list logo
