On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:43:13 -0400
Matt wrote:
> I'm going to use the multipocessing library from here forward so I can
> take advantage of multiple cores and clusters. Either one should work
> for my use, since in my non-demonstration code each thread spends most
> of it's time waiting for
I'm going to use the multipocessing library from here forward so I can
take advantage of multiple cores and clusters. Either one should work
for my use, since in my non-demonstration code each thread spends most
of it's time waiting for a separate non-Python subprocess (created
with subproc
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
OdarR wrote:
> On 13 juin, 07:25, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> > There was quite interesting explaination of what happens when you send
> > ^C with threads, posted on concurrency-sig list recently:
> >
> > http://blip.tv/file/2232410
> > http://www.dabeaz.co
On 13 juin, 07:25, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> There was quite interesting explaination of what happens when you send
> ^C with threads, posted on concurrency-sig list recently:
>
> http://blip.tv/file/2232410
> http://www.dabeaz.com/python/GIL.pdf
>
> Can be quite shocking, but my experience w/ thr
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
koranthala wrote:
> Are there other videos/audio like this? I am learning more from these
> videos than by experience alone.
Indeed, it is a very interesting presentation, but I'm afraid I've
stumbled upon it just as you did, but on concurrency-sig mailin
On Jun 13, 10:25 am, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:35:15 -0700
> Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:44:24 -0500, "Strax-Haber, Matthew (LARC-D320)"
> > declaimed the following in
> > gmane.comp.python.general:
>
> > > I sent this to the Tutor mailing list
