Brilliant, I love it. Thanks a million, guys.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jan 10, 4:19 pm, Rob Williscroft wrote:
> Note that doing the above *before* any other module imports
> from sender, will be sufficient in *any* case, though it won't
> help if the tested code calls reload( sender ).
Yeah, of course, but most of the time, you want to mock at the *test*
level,
wrote in news:a9ed10ff-d907-46f0-8c6a-
c3d95579a...@k1g2000prb.googlegroups.com in comp.lang.python:
> To answer to Rob: yeah, sure that would work, but I always thought
Just to note: you're answering a question about testing, but I
answered how to alter the alerter module *for* testing. given
On Jan 10, 4:21 am, Silfheed wrote:
> So I'm in the current testing situation:
>
> sender.py:
> -
> def sendEmails():
> return "I send emails"
>
> alerter.py:
> -
> from sender import *
> def DoStuffAndSendEmails():
> doStuff()
> sendEmails()
>
> I'm trying to write
Silfheed wrote in news:c73b304b-f601-4bb5-89c1-3ee667eeb7d9
@l37g2000vba.googlegroups.com in comp.lang.python:
> So I'm in the current testing situation:
>
> sender.py:
> -
> def sendEmails():
>return "I send emails"
>
> alerter.py:
> -
> from sender import *
> def Do
Silfheed wrote:
So I'm in the current testing situation:
sender.py:
-
def sendEmails():
return "I send emails"
alerter.py:
-
from sender import *
def DoStuffAndSendEmails():
doStuff()
sendEmails()
I'm trying to write a test fn that will test DoStuffAndSendEmails(
