On Jan 7, 2008 7:55 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fair enough. Just wanted to give some more details as to
> where to look for things that look like leaks, but are in
> fact just results of internal feature of the Python
> interpreter.
We have a hackfest coming up in the Fedora Co
On 2008-01-05 03:19, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 11:56 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The most common answer I heard was possible fragmentation, meaning
>>> there are no or few completely empty blocks to be found. If there are
>>> no 'leaks' in the VM, then it's probably
Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> A couple of developers have mentioned that python might be fragmenting
> its memory space, and is unable to free up those pages. How can I go
> about testing for this, and are there any known problems like this?
> If not, what else can I do to look for leaks?
Marc-Andre bro
On Jan 4, 2008 11:56 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The most common answer I heard was possible fragmentation, meaning
> > there are no or few completely empty blocks to be found. If there are
> > no 'leaks' in the VM, then it's probably related to how memory is
> > freed.
>
> Yo
On 2008-01-04 17:23, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 11:10 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you're using lots of small objects, you may be running into a
>> problem with the Python memory allocation mechanism, pymalloc. It used
>> to not return memory to the system. In Python
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> Aside from that (rant), I seriously dislike Python's memory management and
> even more the fairly arcane ways people have to go about
> debugging/troubleshooting some 600 MB to 2-3 GB(!) of resident memory use by
> Python.
>
> Personally I consider this the w
On Jan 4, 2008 11:10 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're using lots of small objects, you may be running into a
> problem with the Python memory allocation mechanism, pymalloc. It used
> to not return memory to the system. In Python 2.5 (IIRC, could be
> 2.6) this was changed t
On Jan 4, 2008 10:34 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As various people pointed out to me:
> http://wingolog.org/archives/2007/11/27/reducing-the-footprint-of-python-applications
It did; it's what lead me to Heapy.
> Aside from that (rant), I seriously dislike Python
On 2008-01-04 16:07, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Firstly, this is my first post here, so I hope I'm not breaking some
> unwritten etiquette rule about asking questions involving several
> different libraries.
>
> I'm trying to plug some memory leaks in a TurboGears program. We (the
> Fedo
-On [20080104 16:11], Yaakov Nemoy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I'm trying to plug some memory leaks in a TurboGears program. We (the
>Fedora Project) have a few apps in Turbogears in infrastructure that
>all seem to be running into the same issues in a variety of
>configurations. Hopefully when I
10 matches
Mail list logo
