Re: Matplotlib 3D limitations, please recommend alternative

2018-07-07 Thread John Ladasky
On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 6:36:16 AM UTC-7, Rick Johnson wrote: > John Ladasky wrote: > > > Back then I wrote: > > > > "I have concluded that Qt, PyQt, and OpenGL are all > > rapidly-evolving, and huge, software packages. There may > > be compatibility problems, and relevant examples with the

Re: Matplotlib 3D limitations, please recommend alternative

2018-07-06 Thread John Ladasky
On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 at 6:38:18 PM UTC-7, William Ray Wing wrote: > > On Jul 4, 2018, at 5:53 PM, John Ladasky wrote: [snip] > > I explored Python OpenGL bindings about three years ago, and quickly got > > bogged down. Even with Python to assist, dealing with OpenGL was like > > trying to

Re: Matplotlib 3D limitations, please recommend alternative

2018-07-06 Thread John Ladasky
On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 at 3:30:32 PM UTC-7, Rick Johnson wrote: > On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 at 4:53:19 PM UTC-5, John Ladasky wrote: > > There are many 3D graphics packages on PyPI. Some appear to be quite > > specialized. I would appreciate your recommendations. Thanks! > > If you don't

Re: Matplotlib 3D limitations, please recommend alternative

2018-07-04 Thread William Ray Wing via Python-list
> On Jul 4, 2018, at 5:53 PM, John Ladasky wrote: > > I'm a regular Matplotlib user. Normally, I graph functions. I just > attempted to graph an icosahedral surface using the plot_trisurf() methods of > Matplotlib's Axes3D. I have discovered that Matplotlib is basically > hard-wired for gra