On Mon, 26 May 2014 12:17:10 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 26/05/2014 07:31, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mark Lawrence
>> wrote:
>>> On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
>>> That's good to know, it'll
On 26/05/2014 07:31, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
This seems like an unnecessarily harsh w
Ben Finney, 26.05.2014 05:20:
> bookaa bookaa writes:
>> Generally, people consider Python as a script language.
>> It has high development efficiency
>> but run too slowly
>
> Which Python implementation are you talking about? Run time is not a
> property of the language. It is a property of the
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
>>
>
> That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
This seems like an unnecessarily harsh way of putting it, Mark. Could
you be le
bookaa bookaa writes:
> Generally, people consider Python as a script language.
Count me as one who does not. Python is a general-purpose language.
> It has high development efficiency
True.
> but run too slowly
Which Python implementation are you talking about? Run time is not a
property of
On 25/05/2014 12:02, mm0fmf wrote:
On 25/05/2014 11:24, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
OT:
Mark, you've been pro-Python3 enough in your recent postings
On 25/05/2014 11:24, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
OT:
Mark, you've been pro-Python3 enough in your recent postings you have
forced me to act. I've ju
On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
---
This email is fr
bookaa bookaa, 25.05.2014 10:17:
> I think the significance of Python to Go, is it give us opportunity to
> make Python project run fast.
You shouldn't make that your only goal, because you'll have a really hard
time achieving it (to put it mildly).
Stefan
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/l
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 6:17 PM, bookaa bookaa wrote:
>> 1) How compatible is your Python-to-Golang converter with all the
>> nuances of Python code? Does it work perfectly on any arbitrary Python
>> script? And, what version of Python is it aimed at?
>
> I try to support all Python syntax, any ar
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 12:47:27 PM UTC+8, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, bookaa wrote:
>
> > This tool can be called 'Python to GoLang', which translate Python source
> > to Golang source. And then you can compile the Go files to executable
> > binary. (btw: Go is a ne
My opinions about Go.
i) go build XXX that creates an exe, one can put on
a usb stick and run (distribute) it, is a feature hard
to beat.
I do not know, if it will be rendered correctly.
D:\jm\jmgo>hello3.exe
ASCII abcde xyz
Germanäöü ÄÖÜ ß
Polishąęźżńł
Russian абвгдеж эюя
CJK
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, bookaa bookaa wrote:
> This tool can be called 'Python to GoLang', which translate Python source to
> Golang source. And then you can compile the Go files to executable binary.
> (btw: Go is a new C-like compilable language, open source).
>
Sounds like you're wr
13 matches
Mail list logo
