Re: Lookup caching

2006-12-12 Thread Andrea Griffini
MRAB wrote: ... > What are you using for the timestamp? Are you calling a function to > read a timer? For timestamp I used a static variable; to update the timestamp for a dictionary I used d->timestamp = ++global_dict_timestamp; I'm using a single counter for all dicts so that when doi

Re: Lookup caching

2006-12-12 Thread MRAB
Andrea Griffini wrote: > Gabriel Genellina wrote: > > At Saturday 9/12/2006 23:04, Andrea Griffini wrote: > > > >> I implemented that crazy idea and seems working... in its > >> current hacked state can still pass the test suite (exluding > > > > What crazy idea? And what is this supposed to do? >

Re: Lookup caching

2006-12-11 Thread Andrea Griffini
Gabriel Genellina wrote: > At Saturday 9/12/2006 23:04, Andrea Griffini wrote: > >> I implemented that crazy idea and seems working... in its >> current hacked state can still pass the test suite (exluding > > What crazy idea? And what is this supposed to do? > The idea is to avoid looking up co

Re: Lookup caching

2006-12-11 Thread Gabriel Genellina
At Saturday 9/12/2006 23:04, Andrea Griffini wrote: I implemented that crazy idea and seems working... in its current hacked state can still pass the test suite (exluding What crazy idea? And what is this supposed to do? -- Gabriel Genellina Softlab SRL ___