On 25Dec2019 01:20, mail.python@marco.sulla.e4ward.com
wrote:
About the extra comma, it's da**ed useful:
[...]
The real problem is this one:
a = 1,
Unreadable and prone to subtle errors, because maybe you added the
comma by mistake. Caution: Debugging Nightmares.
Hoo, yes. Only the ot
On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 at 00:56, Avi Gross
wrote:
> I may not be understanding what you are objecting to
I, sir, am objecting that I replied to a topic, and you answered to
me, but in another topic. You could have respond to me in the correct
topic, and then create this other one (that I'm not real
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 10:50 AM Avi Gross via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Cameron,
>
> I am not at all against the feature. I like it as my programming style is
> like you describe. One entry per line indented at the same level, in
> multiple languages. I often do graphics where I generate an image th
convenience is in some sense removing a mathematical symmetry,
but so what?
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Simpson
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2019 5:12 PM
To: Avi Gross
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Lists And Extra Commas at end
On 24Dec2019 16:48, Avi Gross wrote:
>
On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 at 22:51, Avi Gross via Python-list
wrote:
> So, is that a feature you want warnings about? After all, a dangling comma
> may simply mean you left something out and meant to add later?
.completely OT. I responded to a topic named "List and missing
commas", and suggested a
On 24Dec2019 16:48, Avi Gross wrote:
Let me switch gears to the terminal comma situation. Unlike many
languages, Python decided a dangling comma is perfectly allowable in
many situations, perhaps all.
a=[1,2,3,]
a
[1, 2, 3]
[...]
And, of course, you can use the same dangling comma in makin
