Chris Angelico writes:
> What if the base class implemented study(), and then LazyStudent
> subclasses Student but makes study() raise NotImpl? Would that break
> things? In a sense, it breaks the whole "this is a student so it
> should act like a student" rule.
That would break the Liskov subst
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> def study(self, subject):
> raise NotImplementedError
>
> See? We can have overstretched analogies *and* remain within the Liskov
> substitution principle.
>
Hehe! Of course I was speaking utterly in jest, but this raises
(so
