On May 3, 1:31 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 3, 9:41 am, Trans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm taking a pole on how best to name programming library packages.
>
> Well, the Poles have been wrong before.
I don't know what's worse, my misspelling or your joke ;-)
On May 3, 9:41 am, Trans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm taking a pole on how best to name programming library packages.
Well, the Poles have been wrong before.
> If you have a second, please have a look.
>
> http://7ranscode.blogspot.com/2007/05/library-poll.html
>
> Thanks,
> T.
--
http://
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> quoting:
>
> Modules should have short, lowercase names, without underscores.
>
> this still doesn't explain Cookie.
PEP-008 didn't exist since the beginning of Python's development. Cookie
(I believe) predates PEP-008.
--
Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> quoting:
>
> Modules should have short, lowercase names, without underscores.
>
> this still doesn't explain Cookie.
the document you're quoting also says:
This document was adapted from Guido's original Python Style
Guide essay[2]
where [2] points to a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> quoting:
>
> Modules should have short, lowercase names, without underscores.
>
> this still doesn't explain Cookie.
Sure it does. The subject line says "conventions", and a convention
isn't a firm rule, just something many people agree on. Obviously the
auth
quoting:
Modules should have short, lowercase names, without underscores.
this still doesn't explain Cookie.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> see http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0008.html for naming conventions
and
> other style issues
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
see http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0008.html for naming conventions and
other style issues
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
