Re: LiClipse

2013-03-23 Thread Fabio Zadrozny
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:27 PM, rusi wrote: > On Mar 23, 4:11 pm, Fabio Zadrozny wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:38 AM, rusi wrote: > > > > > > ie Eclipse-4 claims to have made plugin development (for new custom > > > languages) easier. > > > What is the relation of liclipse to eclipse 3

Re: LiClipse

2013-03-23 Thread rusi
On Mar 23, 4:11 pm, Fabio Zadrozny wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:38 AM, rusi wrote: > > > > ie Eclipse-4 claims to have made plugin development (for new custom > > languages) easier. > > What is the relation of liclipse to eclipse 3<->4 plugin architecture? > > Well, it may have become a bi

Re: LiClipse

2013-03-23 Thread Fabio Zadrozny
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Wanderer wrote: > On Saturday, March 23, 2013 7:11:10 AM UTC-4, Fabio Zadrozny wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:38 AM, rusi wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 7:58 am, Fabio Zadrozny wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello there, > > > > > > > > > > As I've prop

Re: LiClipse

2013-03-23 Thread Wanderer
On Saturday, March 23, 2013 7:11:10 AM UTC-4, Fabio Zadrozny wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:38 AM, rusi wrote: > > > > > On Mar 23, 7:58 am, Fabio Zadrozny wrote: > > > > > Hello there, > > > > > > As I've proposed it, let me try to explain it a bit better (if you have > > > doubts

Re: LiClipse

2013-03-23 Thread Fabio Zadrozny
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:38 AM, rusi wrote: > On Mar 23, 7:58 am, Fabio Zadrozny wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > As I've proposed it, let me try to explain it a bit better (if you have > > doubts, I should probably rephrase the proposal). > > > > There are 2 main targets there: keeping PyDev p

Re: LiClipse

2013-03-22 Thread rusi
On Mar 23, 7:58 am, Fabio Zadrozny wrote: > Hello there, > > As I've proposed it, let me try to explain it a bit better (if you have > doubts, I should probably rephrase the proposal). > > There are 2 main targets there: keeping PyDev properly supported (which > hopefully doesn't need more explana

Re: LiClipse

2013-03-22 Thread Fabio Zadrozny
Hello there, As I've proposed it, let me try to explain it a bit better (if you have doubts, I should probably rephrase the proposal). There are 2 main targets there: keeping PyDev properly supported (which hopefully doesn't need more explanation) and creating LiClipse. The idea for LiClipse is

Re: LiClipse

2013-03-22 Thread Verde Denim
On 03/22/2013 04:26 PM, Wanderer wrote: > I just updated PyDev and I got this message that they are looking for funding > for a new flavor of Eclipse called LiClipse. The description of what LiClipse > will be is kind of sketchy. No offense intended, but why? There is already a > bunch of downlo

Re: LiClipse

2013-03-22 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:26:31 -0700, Wanderer wrote: > I just updated PyDev and I got this message that they are looking for > funding for a new flavor of Eclipse called LiClipse. The description of > what LiClipse will be is kind of sketchy. No offense intended, but why? > There is already a bunch